MiniRollOffTrucks.com
Synchro-Link.com

<>   HOME  <>    JOURNAL  <>  CURRENT EVENTS  <>  DOCUMENTS  <>  PROFILE  <>

INTEREST
> Synchro-Link Pictures
> About S-Link

> Creating S-Link

> Building S-Link
> Setting it Straight
> Numbers

> My Next Truck

> Roll-off Camper.com
> Synchro-Tooler
> Caddy Trunk
> Dumping Trailer
> BS Plan
> Numbers Game
> Video
OTHER TOPICS
> Roadrage
> Diesel or Gas
> Car Guys
> It's Only Junk
> Letters
> Helpful Hints
OTHER PLACES
> RollOffCamper.com
> HookLiftTruck.com
> MyStupidRules.com
> BooksbySunnyside.com
> Iwishyouluck.com
> MorroBayNews.info

Helpful Hints
@ Synchro-link.com

 

Depending on how much money I have, whether I'm having to build my next truck from money I make from pounding nails or having my books sell well, plans can differ a great deal.

 

Some may wonder if I would be worried if I ever had a fire.
To be honest with you, I would never count on any fire department. And I'm one who would be more worried about having a fireman commit arson.

That means, big fence and motion detectors around the perimeter to keep them out. And any manufacturing facility of mine will have fire hose racks all over the place because the last call I ever want to make is to an outside fire department.

I would have my own firefighters. Meaning I would give any of my crew who could carry me on their back up a flight of starts to have the opportunity to be trained as a professional firefighter and they would be paid a little more per hour to be a in house firefighter whether the are a welder or a painter and I'd make sure that everyone would have a closet with their gear inside where ever their work stations are.

You say that might be hard to do. Nah, because I'm the one who's doing the hiring. I'd be keeping my eyes out for them, but then I think a above average IQ text score would be needed to seal the deal.

I noticed the people are surprised that I would think of building my truck with new parts and not remanufactured.
People, you just can't expect to go somewhere and be able to have them make something for you when they already have bigger customers.
     Like what odds do you think you could go to someone like the people who own Kenworth a Freightliner and ask them to build some cabs for you? Yeah, not very likely. And if you did get Peterbilt interested, wouldn't you wonder what kind of engineering and set up fees they would want.

Yeah, while there is fields full of used cabs out there.

But you see, running gear would become the sparest the soonest.

See, it all amounts to how much money you have. Sure the more the better, but if you are borrowing; you have to wonder if you an even get all the parts in one place before the overhead starts to get you.

As I've said before,
I don't care how many I'm producing;
I just want to be producing.
I wouldn't wait for parts when there plenty of reusable ones out there for the picking.
Besides, some happen to like the idea of going green.


MiniRollOffTruck.com

 

RollOffCamper.com

 

Synchro-Link.com

 

























HookLiftTruck.com
 













Girls of the Day
@ MyStupidRules.com






















 

Home


My Next Truck

Building a truck can be as difficult as anyone could want to make it. I've worked on race cars and I understand that a vehicle is just a bunch of components put together. I happen to think that the doors, hinges and window tracks are about the hardest parts to fabricate.

Ah, don't need no stinking doors
and I know how to park it myself, thank you.

In fact I've been thinking of building my next and very well be the first batch of trucks with reconditioned conventional cabs because of it. The hood or as some might call " bonnet" can easily be custom fabricated to fit the smaller running gear. Once made: a mold isn't the hardest thing to do, and popping out fiberglass or epoxy hoods is something many boat shops around know how to do. (But I prefer an all aluminum one.)

If I wanted to make some work out of it, I'd just lengthen the top of the cab and chop down the window post and lower upper window tracks down a few inches. The door windows will just roll right up to it just like chop toping any other pickup, simple as that. But then again I think I may very well leave the cab the original height because I happen to like the headroom.

For myself I want to have a 235 hp Cummins B engine with something like a six speed manual shift automatic  Allison transmission. I happen to like the older 12 valve models (at least they still sound like a tractor.) but would like to get the 235 hp torque plate for the fuel pump. I feel if you are not pumping so much fuel in order to get so much power, you simply need less polution bullshit to run along with it. Having a 6 speed with about 500 punds of torque would be suffisant to do most anything a mini roll off would need to do.

I not a big fan of four wheel drive because most people don't really need it with a dually. Also 4 wheel drive running gear takes away about 400-500 lb.  of payload capacity and I've noticed that on every four wheel drive truck that I ever had; if you are going to have some problem with the running gear, it will most likely be four wheel drive related.
          I'm going to start by rounding up some old running gear from a F-450 (About 1987 and up until 2002 when they changed over to the coil link suspension.) because I like the dropped front straight axle with the downward curved leaf springs. I've got to get the rear end too because the bolt patterns are different than on the Dodge. I'm hoping to find one with a positive traction rear-end in it with 3.73 gears. They had 16" wheels but I would prefer 19s' found on the latter years. But then you have to consider the benefits of having a lower center of gravity as well as a lower cost on a new set of rubber.. (Just have to make the fender wheels match.)

I drive by this truck almost every morning.
They just don't make them this way anymore.
It's just like the big boys.
           I've been told that they still make these axiles somewhere in the world, a guy told me that I should be able to find one on the internet.

I know how I could make this set up even better.

         I also like the fact that I mount my rear fenders higher than most hook-lift and roll-off suppliers do. (They remind me of the trailer shop I worked at where they would put a 4x4 block of wood on the tire to hold the fender up before they welded it.)
         I happen to like my flat top fenders, but others who want less bed tilt and less expense will want the round.)
          I'll find an old Peterbilt cab, (because they have the simple dashes inside and less parts to rattle.) and hopefully find one with the older style with the narrow aluminum bonnet. I'd cut the fenders off and install smaller ones higher up on the sides. I happen to like the older round single head lamp buckets but they've got both round and rectangular lights with quarts bulbs. (I hate those new blue lights.) The rectangular light frames would make it look more modern of course and if the dual rectangular ones could be wired with a real neat feature. (I'd wire both sets for high and low beams and aim one set higher and aim the other set lower. That way with no bed on, you would use the pair aimed higher. Then if you had a heavy load on....You just switch to the other pair.

Lets say I get my web-site selling my books well.

I'd get a larger warehouse and a forklift or better yet an overhead bridge or gantry crane. I'd get a plasma cutter or maybe even a cutting table. Cutting touches and all. A good welder, compressor, bandsaw. (One thing nobody does is have one big bandsaw set straight, and another set up at 45 degrees, because for some reason, I'm just crafty with 45's.)  What I'd really like is a hydraulic punch because a drill press is just way too slow. I'd like to get an straight line tractor welder too and eventually robotic ones. I'd start off by building two trucks and build a few jigs in the process.

Since it would have a tilt nose like the big trucks, a mechanic wouldn't have to pull a starter just to get to the fuel pump. If I start building the cabs from scratch, the standard cab will have longer doors and a longer rear cab portion so that there will be enough room behind the seat to carry two bass guitars instead of one and the driver seat will be able to recline. I love the thought of having an air ride seat most of all, because when you reach the 15,000 - 20,000 pound range, the ride with no bed on it would make you want to ware a kidney belt.

I'll have a jump seat which will open up to be a large tool box underneath it. (From using multiple payload beds, I discovered that I'd need tools and straps I use with all the different beds.)

Basically it would be quite similar to the older narrow nose Peterbilts. But if the nose was shortened it would end up just a little wider at the nose which would almost scale out to the more modern looking trucks. The cabs are actually  about 6 inches narrower then this piece ah shit Dodge, how ever I like it that way and even three or four inches narrower would even be better for cutting the wind. (Kinna like a sports car of trucks.) All I care about is having two seats and room for a center consol, or shift linkage and an armrest. I don't think the market for these things are tired to prospect of a person buying one to take the kids to the a soccer game.
But them again, I saw what use to be a bus for carrying hot shot fire fighters up in to the woods. The box on back would have made a real handy bus for the weekends.

What I'm looking for is a truck with more payload capacity and better fuel mileage and I think a smaller, lighter and narrower cab is the way to do it with out getting so high tech it would take a damn computer to park it.

Since the standard cabs total almost a foot taller than these car styled cabs, if retrofitted, I would just raise the floor a bit and take out some of the tops dome, which would equal to a 6 or 7 inch drop in height.  The real true modification that retrofitting just wouldn't make is being about to put a little more slope to the windshields. A brand new custom cab is the only way I can get the windshield to slope - cost effectively..

Little longer doors, a little behind the set.
Rule no. 4

The front windshield will probably be of the two piece design so it will cost less to get rid of a broken windshield. And I love the dual windshield wiper motors, with double wiper arms. They will move from one side of the window frame to the other with the blades straight up and down. I've always liked those.

And like my brakes: I don't want any ABS crap going on, I just want hydraulics, because I want to be the one who is doing the stopping.
(I'd like an interior adjustable rear brake proportioning valve like the ones used in race cars.)

Eventually I would offer a cab-over design for the market that has to operate in congested city streets but those designs would be more complex to start from scratch, and I have a strong feeling that once people drove the conventional cab design, they would know what they would be missing and prefer the conventional cab over the cab-over design.

Sure I would eventually offer stretched cabs and crew cabs, but starting out, I happen to thinks the best market is the one I described for myself.

Now there has been some things I wish I had a second opinion on. However, I'll give you my own take on it. It's between the fuel tanks, hydraulic oil tanks, battery's and the hydraulic manifold block.

As you know, most of the big boy trucks have outside of the frame rail tanks. But mine will be fakes with a step built in. My truck will have two fuel tanks, one on each side of the drive line. The reason for two is I feel it's better to keep them shorter so that I can put a more solid looking cross members just in front and just behind the rear of the two tanks, because the way they got them on this piece of shit of mine, the cross members resemble more like straps above and below the frame rails and nothing in between. (which lets the frame twist.) I want my cross members to fill in between the frame rails and resemble the big boys, not the toys..

Then even though I found a good place to my hydraulic reservoir on the Chrysler piece. I feel mounting under one of the fake side tanks will help move weight  forward and the manifold block right next to it is even better. Then the other side would have the two batteries and a storage place for tools and straps.

Pretty cool truck huh? Yeah, I've had it figured out for over a decade and nobody out there was even smart enough to even think of building anything like it. But now you have a better idea of just how I would want to build it. I bet you want nothing else. Isn't there a saying that you always want what you can't have. Well it's your own fault. You haven't done anything but feel sorry for me. Hell they have you driving some kind of SUV with a tin can on back. I feel sorry for you.

Yeah, I bet everyone will wants to build parts for me. But how many of you think you can even do what you want to do in this country. They say you can do anything you want to in America. Well, just prove it.

As for my own design of a truck -- if one couldn't get at least 300,000 miles out of it, there would be something wrong with it. I'd just build it like the big conventional rigs but in a scaled down version. Sure it will cost more than the tin cans that are offer to you now, but my truck would pay for itself so what's the price mater anyway? No doubt it would be the better deal.

And oh, there are several modifications my truck will have, not only to the system on back but the chassis itself, but I'm not about to list them because that is privileged information.

 

BS Plan

Next -  Setting it Straight

The Numbers Game

 

© Copyright 2006. All rights reserved. Dennis James Sattler